refers to the landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Listed here’s a brief overview:

In accordance with the EPA charge schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be meant for redistribution over the internet or for commercial purposes. 

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal and traffic case information inside the general district courts for the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.

Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to make it suitable to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified from the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Let’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that among the list of respondents has here retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for your respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature in the seized currency.

I)       The above mentioned referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father of your petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is definitely an eyewkness with the occurrence.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment of the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.

To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the largest tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to carry out, i.e. safe its citizens.

It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 of your Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.